GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M330 vs 960M among Laptop GPUs
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Install AMD Radeon R5 M330 driver for Windows 10 x64, or download DriverPack Solution software for automatic driver installation and update. HOW TO configure AMD Switchable Graphics in Radeon Software Crimson. (R5) and dedicated (R5 M330) Recorded on AMD Radeon R5 M330 2GB, A8 6410, 4+4GB RAM laptop. AMD Radeon R5 M330 2GB HDD.
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
![Amd Radeon R5 M330 Driver Amd Radeon R5 M330 Driver](/uploads/1/2/5/2/125293040/539792275.jpg)
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
Overall Score |
Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
![Radeon Radeon](/uploads/1/2/5/2/125293040/317096152.png)
AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
| ||||||
Lower TDP | 18W | vs | 75W | 4.2x lower TDP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,777.5 | vs | 5,972 | Around 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | ||
Significantly better PassMark score | 2,043 | vs | 582 | More than 3.5x better PassMark score | ||
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 5,277 | vs | 1,659 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark06 score | ||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | ||
Higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 955 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | ||
Higher memory bandwidth | 80.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth | ||
Better floating-point performance | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | vs | 659.2 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | ||
Much higher thief framerate | 27.8 | vs | 5.1 | Around 5.5x higher thief framerate | ||
Much higher BioShock infinite framerate | 45.3 fps | vs | 8.2 fps | More than 5.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate | ||
Better bitcoin mining score | 174.57 mHash/s | vs | 72.41 mHash/s | Around 2.5x better bitcoin mining score | ||
Higher texture rate | 43.9 GTexel/s | vs | 20.6 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | ||
Higher pixel rate | 17.55 GPixel/s | vs | 8.24 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | ||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 1,030 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | ||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 40% higher memory clock speed | ||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 320 | Twice as many shading units | ||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 20 | Twice as many texture mapping units | ||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | ||
Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | ||
Better manhattan score | 3,713.7 | vs | 3,428.74 | Around 10% better manhattan score |